Full Paper

The Full paper submission type is for completed work, or work at a phase where actual results are available.
Authors must submit an abstract of no more than 500 words, via the 2016 Web page by the submission deadline.
The author must submit: author's name, paper title, author's affiliation, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address.
Each abstract should be between 300 and 500 words in length, Times New Roman 24 pt. font for title, Times New Roman 12 pt. font for body. Use single column format for abstract with 1 inch margins.
One author from each paper is expected to register for and attend the conference. The registered author can present more than one paper.
Final papers will be limited to six pages, not including references or Author Bios. See the paper guidelines for font and spacing requirements.
Full papers will be peer-reviewed by at least two reviewers. The purpose of the review will be to check for completeness and accuracy of the work.
Abstract submission deadline April 11, 2016.
Authors will be notified of acceptance or rejection of their proposed paper by April 18, 2016.
If your submission is accepted, papers are due for peer review by May 23, 2016.
Authors will be notified of peer review results by June 17, 2016.
Modified papers will be due by July 11, 2016.

All authors on a paper will be expected to participate in the review process.

Basic Paper Descriptions

To help authors prepare their final submissions, the conference suggests the following guidelines for preparing a Full paper.

What is the breadth of the audience that will be interested in the subject of the paper?
To what extent are the practices described in the paper innovative, leading-edge, cutting-edge?
Has the research already been done or proposed?
To what degree have questions about purpose, potential hypotheses, and possible methodologies been addressed?
Paper should be professionally written and presented.

Purpose of the paper - These are suggestions not requirements: Papers could share information about how a faculty member or team has developed and implemented novel practices across the breadth of topics of interest to conference participants. The work should contain some results to support their findings.; Papers could share information about how a faculty member or group of faculty members has developed and implemented new practices explicitly based on research on engineering education and/or education. The paper should demonstrate transfer from research to practice. The work should contain results to support their findings.
Content: Papers may be made in various forms, but they should answer such questions as: What situation is being addressed? What are the goals of the practice being implemented? What research provides the foundations for the inventive practice?; It is suggested that the final paper should describe the setting for the practice, motivations for the practice, what has been accomplished, what remains to be done, or some similar content.; It is suggested that the final paper should describe research that has supported the practice, how does the research incorporate any relevant research, a brief synopsis of the methodology, and/or describe the research question(s).; Finally, it is suggested that the final paper should describe what results have been obtained, and what remains to be done, or some similar content.